Creative analytics · Meta

Facebook ads creative analytics: 
what kind of creative wins. 

See what kind of creative wins on your Meta account: AI tagging, creative DNA, spend-weighted findings and a written report. Included on every plan.

Performance grouped by actual creative, not by ad

Six comparable traits, tagged by AI

Findings weighted by spend, not by count

Start free trial

See pricing7-day free trial · No credit card

uplads.com/analytics

Ads Manager answers "which ad spent what." It cannot answer the question a media buyer actually briefs from: what kind of creative wins on this account - UGC or produced, question hooks or bold claims, problem-first or offer-first. Answering that requires two things Ads Manager does not do: grouping performance by the real creative asset, and describing every creative in comparable terms.

The uplads creative report does both, on top of the same bulk launch library you already work from.

First problem: Meta splits your creative's history

Upload the same video into five campaigns and Meta stores five video IDs. Your best creative's track record is scattered across rows that look unrelated. uplads folds them back together - by the creative's actual content and by the upload library's file fingerprints - so one creative is one row: total spend, total results, every ad it ran in, every country it ran to.

That grouping is the foundation. Every number on the page - ROAS, cost per result, hook rate, hold rate, CTR - is per creative, with a one-click country filter and a comparison window against the previous period.

Second problem: "which won" is not "what kind wins"

An AI pass reads each creative once and tags it along those six fixed dimensions - fixed on purpose: a shared vocabulary is what makes "every UGC ad on the account" a filterable, comparable set instead of a vibe. The same pass stores a detailed per-creative deconstruction: the observable hook, the mechanism, the core desire, value proposition, offer, proof, objections, CTA and on-screen text. Videos are transcribed, so the analysis includes what the ad says, not only what the thumbnail shows.

Each creative is analyzed exactly once and the result is stored and reused - re-opening the report costs nothing, and AI credits are only spent when new creatives appear.

Creative DNA: where the spend sits, and whether it earns its keep

The DNA view splits the account's spend across every trait value and grades each one against the account's own benchmark - not an industry average. You see, in one screen, that 60% of spend sits on product shots performing below the account benchmark while UGC runs above it on a fraction of the budget. Filter the entire report down to one trait and compare like with like.

On top of the findings sits a written report: what works on this account, what does not, and what to do next - ranked, in prose you can paste into a creative brief or forward to a client. Shareable read-only links exist for exactly that.

The Launch Cockpit: did what I launched actually win?

The second view answers a narrower question from uplads' own launch history: what did I launch, and did it win? Because it is built from your launches rather than reconstructed from the ad account, it stays honest about what you shipped - including creatives that never earned delivery. It covers uplads-launched creatives; the creative report above covers the whole account.

How it fits the loop

Where it ends

This is post-launch intelligence for Meta accounts. It does not predict a creative's performance before it runs, it does not analyze TikTok or Google accounts, and it is not an attribution suite - there is no pixel and no customer-journey tracking. It reads what your Meta account already knows and turns it into a brief. For the launch side of the loop, start at the bulk upload page; for plans, the pricing page - the report is included on every tier.